The Liberal world is a scripted world, life is a stage where they write the script to suit themselves. Apparently their audience buys into this and is willing to subjugate their own thought processes to this monolithic single brain social order.
Drilling will not bring down the price of Oil:
Obviously hypotheticals are difficult to deal with. The fact that they want to sue OPEC to produce more oil seems to indicate that ONLY OUR OIL won't bring down prices. The fact that just the threat of less oil, bomb in Nigeria, Hurricane in gulf of Mexico immediately shoots UP the price of oil dosnt seem to phase them. The laws of supply and demand are written out of our world and Obama and Pelosi and Harry Ried all swear to that reality. The fact that they want to release strategic reserves to bring prices dowm immediately dosnt seem inconsistant to them?
Actually they don't want cheap oil, they just want to get the heat off of themselves politically. They need to lie about their policies. They actually want high oil prices so they can manipulate the behavior of the USA citizen. These policies won't sell on a one to one honest presentation. Obama let it slip when he said he welcomed higher prices just sort of wished it was more gradual.
The liberals want to manipulate our futures and don't have the moral certainty to try to sell us their actual policies so they have adopted a mode of subterfuge and lies.
For example: Is a Polar bear an endangered species? The governor of Alsaka says NO. Congress says yes. But the real issue? Tie up the Alaskan resources in so much red tape that it can never be developed. Rescript the world, the kindly USA citizen will support the Polar Bear while he wouldn't support doubling the cost of heating his home. Confuse, rescript, and with deceit and slight of hand accomplish your agenda. Which is? A world order where the USA dosnt consume more than it's fair share, nor wield a power greater than any other nation. They firmly believe this country isnt entitled to it's place in the world, and isnt entitled to pursue it's own self interest.
Is there any validity in this position, of course there is, if you are a socialist, communist or elitest that feels you know better about how peole should live than they do themselves.
The problem is they are not selling us their agenda which we wouldn't buy, they are selling us Polar Bears and Global Warming, while there real goal is to reshape us into a socialistic member of some grand world order.
REMEMBER global warming is a rather new drama, while retarding USA developement stretches back 40 years, there is always SOME reason to impede our prosperity.
AN INCITE FULL LOOK INTO THE ELITEST MIND
Obama on Bill Orielly Interview:
"The surge exceeded beyond anyone’s wildest expectations. "
In other words NOBODY could have anticipated the results.
What about General Patreous, John McCain, President Bush, Joe Lieberman and Dominic J. Melfi?
Actually the surge succeeded beyond the wildest expectation of the monolithic single brain the liberals use. Conservatives seem to understand cause and effect better (remember Dilling won't help?). This Surge was a difficult premise, in reality, only in the scripted world of Democratic Liberals. It was Only difficult to the liberals who declared the war LOST (Harry Reid). The liberal script required the USA lose the war in Iraq. That would be a perfect end to the scenario that depicts Bush as a blundering fool.
Does this mean the Democrat/Liberals were pulling against us in Iraq? You are hard put to find any evidence during the second Bush term that the Democratic/Liberals wanted ANY BUSH SUCCESSES. They were reeling in a presidential defeat they didn’t understand. Did defeat in Iraq become something they were hoping for? I believe so. Does that put party over country? I believe so. Does that put party over the well-being of 25million Iraqis? I believe so.
They began with this script “We will lose the war in Iraq and easily defeat the Republicans in 2008.” The monolithic liberal single brain showed no cracks.
OR DID IT?
One prominent Liberal patriot wasn’t mesmerized by the possibility of destroying the Opposition by losing the war, Joe Lieberman risked his career by defying this party line, he wasn’t even endorsed by his own party in 2006. The liberals can’t tolerate any diversity from their script. Lieberman will become a Republican because the monolithic single liberal brain cannot tolerate diversity, even from their most respected members.
The surge exceeded beyond anyone’s wildest expectations.
A patent lie, but the elitist Obama shares a single brain with Pelosi, Reid and others of the liberal democrats, there is NO POSSIBILITY that any idea they don’t embrace has any merit.
Only by the most extreme quirk of a capricious God could they be wrong.
But that’s ok; God is only borrowed by the liberals as a convenience this election, which is part of the script that won’t endure, because ultimately they have scripted God out of this country.
POLAR BEAR AS A PAWN IN THE LIBERAL AGENDA
Of the 13 polar bear populations in Canada, the populations of 11 are stable or growing. The biggest cause of polar-bear deaths: hunters, who shoot an average of 49 polar bears in western Hudson Bay yearly.
Professor J. Scott Armstrong of the Wharton School says, “To list a species that is currently in good health as an endangered species requires valid forecasts that its population would decline to levels that threaten its viability. In fact, the polar bear populations have been increasing rapidly in recent decades due to hunting restrictions. Assuming these restrictions remain, the most appropriate forecast is to assume that the upward trend would continue for a few years, then level off.
A Canadian Press Newswire story earlier this year reported that, in three Arctic villages, polar bears “are so abundant there’s a public safety issue.” The local polar bear population reportedly increased from about 2,100 in 1997 to as many as 2,600 in 2004. Inuit hunters (search) wanted to be able to kill more bears because they are “fearsome predators.”
Polar Bear: Length 8-10 feet, Weight males 600-1200 lbs; females 400-700 lbs., Color All White, Alaska Population Estimate 4,000-6,000.
The ad, a parody of the wild charges and breathless style of many political campaign ads, lets the public know what is not always clear from environmentalist lobbying campaigns: The global population of polar bears is 22,000, about double what it was just four decades ago.
You can also find many articles predicting decline of Polar Bears, the key is PREDICTING DECLINE, there is no decline, exactly the opposite, there is a healthy increase in Polar Bear population in almost all populations. Remember Polar bears are territorial and command huge territories as their own, so populations in the millions will never happen as they do in herd or communal animals such as Caribou.
The reality is that all the predictions of Polar bear decline are based on the same models as the Global Warming arguments. They are one and thee same. So if you believe in these computer models of Global Warming you can also believe in a PREDICTED DECLINE of Polar bears.
THE SINGLE MONOLITHIC MIND OF THE LIBERAL.
While there are thousands of scientists that disagree with the global warming models. Disagree with the fact that global warming is taking place, the monolithic liberals sharing one mind are not only convinced that global warming is real and that “Nobody’s HIGHEST EXPECTATIONS CAN ACCEPT ANYTHING ELSE”, they are in a hysterical panic.
While there are little or no expectations that China or Russia and probably India will adopt any aggressive environmental efforts that will impair there economic development, they are committed to shrink our economy in order to save the world.
They tout the 100 parties to the Kyoto treaty while in fact China and Russia and other members are exempted from regulations.
The single monolithic mind of the liberals has scripted the USA to reducing it’s economy and committing unilateral suicide for the sake of the world. This based on what could very well be a inaccurate science and an invalid premise.
The fact is they can’t save the world by strangling the USA, if all industrialized nations including the China and Russia et al, adopt the same restrictions they want to pose on the USA, maybe persons of a different mind could be convinced.
Meanwhile, because they can’t sell their program of reducing the USA standard of living to the USA citizen, they sell the extinction of Polar Bears and other species as a way to back door their policies, we sometimes depict the liberals as pawns of the Conversationalists. I wonder, if the conversationalists are not pawns of the MONOLITHIC SINGLE BRAINED liberals striving to exert their vision of a socialistic controlled society onto the USA.
The absurdity of taxing corporations to create jobs
Need I say more? Only the SINGLE MONOLITHIC LIBERAL ELITEST MIND could believe they can convince people that the rational way to create jobs is to tax corporations at a higher rate. Nobody in their highest expectations could believe that is helpful So how do the liberals manage to sell this concept? Simple. Class Warfare. Turn everyone in the USA against each other.
If the corporation you worked for had to pay more for health care would you be better off?
If the corporation you worked for had to pay more for energy would you be better off?
If the corporation you worked for had to pay more for supplies would you be better off?
If the corporation you worked for had to pay more for TAXES would you be better off?
Please let's change this script.
Saturday, September 6, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
